From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7869 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2002 05:17:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7861 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2002 05:17:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Aug 2002 05:17:56 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA17312; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:15:37 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 22:17:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: ``detach remote'' In-Reply-To: <20020806210009.GA29965@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > To resume the remote program and stop debugging it, use the `detach' > command. > > This is not how gdbserver works, and it isn't how any stubs I've worked with > behave, either. They'll sit and wait for a reconnection. Rather than > change the status quo, I would like to update the documentation and provide > a way to get the previously documented behavior. This uses the "K" packet > described in my email to gdb@ last week. The new command is `detach remote' > which I'm not thrilled with but I'm a little short on ideas. It's hard to > find something to call this. > > GDB and gdbserver patches attached. Comments? The documentation patch is approved. Thanks.