From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18592 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2002 04:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18582 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2002 04:46:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Aug 2002 04:46:00 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA25447; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 07:43:36 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2002 21:46:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/i386] Consolidate i386 targets In-Reply-To: <3D4D67F6.10605@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Yes, DJGPP is definitly still supported. DJGPP is a native > configuration though, and the above list applies to the cross debuggers. I think that might confuse someone (it did confuse me): there's only one list of targets in MAINTAINERS, so I thought it pertains to any valid target supported by GDB, whether native or cross. If you remove DJGPP from that list, it might cause someone to think DJGPP is no longer supported. Note that I don't have anything against the change to config.tgt.