From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31609 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2002 04:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31602 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2002 04:55:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jul 2002 04:55:38 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA09111; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:53:21 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 01:59:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators In-Reply-To: <20020723183956.GA28558@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Comments? Thanks. The doco changes are approved, with these minor comments: > +@node Redirecting output > +@section Redirecting output Please add here a "@cindex output redirection". > +@kindex > > +@cindex redirect > +@item > @var{file} > +Redirect all output to @var{file}, overwriting it. > +@kindex >> > +@cindex append The two @cindex entries above should probably be changed in minor ways. I would either say "@cindex redirect command" and "@cindex append command", or "@cindex rfedirect output to a file" and "@cindex append output to a file". > +@kindex tee > +@cindex tee Why is @cindex needed here? We do have a @kindex with the same text already.