From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30424 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2002 05:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30407 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2002 05:10:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jul 2002 05:10:36 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA11827; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:07:58 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 22:31:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Mark Kettenis cc: ac131313@ges.redhat.com, muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting In-Reply-To: <200207082046.g68KkQo00587@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2002 14:45:02 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > I would also be in favor of putting it into the branch, but I > > don't know who should decide this.... > > Something for the i386 maintainers to decide. > > I have no objections Me neither.