From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30718 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 05:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30708 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 05:10:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 05:10:41 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA17563; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:09:13 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:10:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: "David S. Miller" cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve Sparc epilogue analysis In-Reply-To: <20020424.180531.51276912.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01006.txt.bz2 On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > you seem to make a lot of > errors reviewing my changes. Please settle down, take your time. At > this point I'd much rather you delay than review things haphazardly. Please try to refrain from such remarks. Please trust the maintainers that they do their best when they review patches. Errors do happen, so please by all means point them out, but please do so in a polite manner, and please assume that they are accidental, and that the maintainer did try to do his/her best job.