From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14783-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 21263 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 04:52:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 21256 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2002 04:52:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2002 04:52:20 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA17370;
	Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:50:56 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:52:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Correct machine name in config/m68k/tm-nbsd.h
In-Reply-To: <20020424102300.B6310@nevyn.them.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020425085018.17284A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01004.txt.bz2


On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> >   I still have a question:
> > should I update the copyright line for such an obvious fix?
> > (I would vote no....)
> 
> I'm pretty sure that the correct answer is yes.  You're modifying the
> file, regardless of obviousness.

FYI, the guidelines for such decisions are in standards.texi (IIRC).