From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14623-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29973 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 13:52:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29951 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 13:52:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 13:52:31 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA28150;
	Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:51:01 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:52:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
cc: kevinb@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Kill SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING (was Re: multi-arch TODO)
In-Reply-To: <20020423.030048.41805003.davem@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020423174953.27983B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00844.txt.bz2


On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, David S. Miller wrote:

>    I haven't given it a lot of thought recently, but my opinion is that
>    the SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING code ought to be enabled everywhere.
>    The only downside that I can think of is that we lose the ability
>    to put a symbol at address 0.
> 
> Sounds find to me, how about this patch?

If this patch removes SOFUN_ADDRESS_MAYBE_MISSING everywhere, please 
don't forget to update gdbint.texinfo, which documents it.

Thanks.