From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16095 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 10:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15839 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 10:06:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 10:06:26 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA12474; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 14:05:00 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 03:06:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Pierre Muller cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] apply shell fix for win32-nat.c in 5.2 branch In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020409103347.00a75f90@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Pierre Muller wrote: > >I have no objections to your ChangeLog. You could just apply the ChangeLog > >as is from the trunk, too. > > I already sometimes saw ChangeLogs > with names of people that didn't even know > that their names where used, so I prefer to stick with > the real name of the committer. The real name of the committer is in the CVS log ("cvs annotate" should show it for every line), so you don't need to make a point of repeating that in the ChangeLog. ChangeLog should (IMHO) state the name of the person who did the actual work on the code change.