From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23945 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2002 05:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23938 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 05:05:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 05:05:38 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA28269; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:58:52 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 22:05:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Rob Savoye cc: Fernando Nasser , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch In-Reply-To: <20020407173534.B16561@welcomehome.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00287.txt.bz2 On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Rob Savoye wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:29:54PM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote: > > > Rob: can you please take a look, specially in the documentation > > changes and see if they are fit for the master repository? > > The texi document is mostly out of date, as I rewrote that whole > manual in SGML about 3 years ago. Would it be possible to get these > same editing changes for the SGML/DocBook version of the docs ? Are there any reason not to continue maintaining the document in Texinfo? Especially since the latest makeinfo supports DocBook (as well as HTML and XML)?