From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20189 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 11:06:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20180 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 11:06:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2002 11:06:16 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA14701; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 13:05:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 03:06:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: cgd@broadcom.com cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] two MIPS opcodes patches to pull up to branch? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 On 24 Mar 2002 cgd@broadcom.com wrote: > What's the format to be used for branch ChangeLogs? > > change log as originally committed (i.e., using original commit date)? > new entry at top of file or sorted in by original date? etc. For changes on the branch, you are supposed to modify the ChangeLog files from the branch only. The date should be the date of the commit (otherwise, the logs are not in chronological order, which makes it hard to track change history). In other words, you should do the same as you do on the trunk. That's why there's no mention of anything special in the branch policy text.