From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8154 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2002 06:04:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7948 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 06:03:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 06:03:58 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA25315; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:02:33 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:04:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Joel Brobecker cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] gdb_realpath causes problems with GVD In-Reply-To: <20020319211353.A20586@act-europe.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00376.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > I'm not sure yet. My doubt stems from the fact that directories are > > also recorded in the debug info, at least with some formats (stabs, > > DWARF2). One place in GDB where we use this is in file-name > > completion, for example when you type "break /foo TAB" and want GDB > > to complete this to "break /foobar/foo.c" (assuming that there's only > > one file foo.c in that directory that was compiled into the program). > > > > Will this break if symlinks are followed in the directory part, but > > not in the file-name part? > > It seems it does. I'm not sure I understand what are you saying: does completion work or does it break in that case? I cannot figure out from your script whether you tried completion, and if so, in what part of the script.