From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21564 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2002 06:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21457 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 06:15:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2002 06:15:41 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA07030; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:14:21 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 22:15:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Jim Blandy cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Recognize bottom of stack on Linux In-Reply-To: <200202040206.VAA21952@zenia.red-bean.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00061.txt.bz2 On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Jim Blandy wrote: > Now, some folks feel that GDB should show the whole stack, including > _start, __libc_start_main, and anything else that's there. However, > this isn't the way GDB has ever traditionally behaved on native > targets. So this patch makes GDB's backtraces end after main. I'm probably missing something important, but couldn't there be a program written in assembly that doesn't have a `main' at all?