From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21005 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2002 09:59:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20963 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 09:59:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 09:59:00 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA17016; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 11:58:14 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 01:59:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/doco] Srink the overlay diagram In-Reply-To: <3C4BA2E8.8090807@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > One of the things giving overfull hboxes is JimB's overlay diagram. The > attached patch srinks it a little. > > ok? Yes, but: > ! To map an overlay, copy its code from the larger address space to the > ! instruction address space. Since the overlays shown here all use the > ! same mapped address, only one may be mapped at a time. > @end group > @end example Why is this text inside the @example? If that's because of the desire to have the text always follow the diagram, I don't see anything that would prevent us from using @need instead of @group. Am I missing something? In general, it's bad to have free text inside @example, since TeX doesn't fill such text. So typesetting that is prone to unexpected problems whenever you change the output dimensions slightly (e.g., with @smallbook etc.). It's best to avoid that entirely.