From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16292 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2002 11:49:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16170 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2002 11:49:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2002 11:49:40 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA10373; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:48:47 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 03:49:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: new diff: gdb.texinfo In-Reply-To: <3C46FC52.10007@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00567.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Andrew, I don't know whether I should bother checking in these changes > > on the branch anymore, what with your intent to release v5.2 from the > > trunk. Please advise. > > The still need to go onto the 5.1 branch because these are fixing (C) > problems and I'm going to have to spin another 5.1.something with those > fixes included (sigh). Okay, I committed to the branch as well. But please check whether making a distribution from the branch works, including "make info", because something strange happened with fdl.texi on the branch, probably because CVS and myself don't get along very well ;-)