From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14459 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2002 11:48:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14341 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2002 11:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2002 11:48:07 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA10346; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 13:47:14 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 03:48:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com cc: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: new diff: gdb.texinfo In-Reply-To: <200201171538.PAA20916@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > I stuck in the @* because the line wasn't breaking and it was causing an > > Overfull /hbox. > > Indeed, but it will probably be in the wrong place for a different > form-factor printing. > > Putting spaces in between each date would allow TeX to select its own > line-breaking points. Since you've no objection, I suggest we do that. Done.