From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23957 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 11:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23924 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 11:59:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 11:59:17 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA15505; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:58:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:59:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com cc: Brian Youmans <3diff@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: new diff: gdb.texinfo In-Reply-To: <200201171009.KAA24413@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00477.txt.bz2 On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > 3diff@gnu.org said: > > ! Copyright @copyright{} 1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,@* > > ! 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > Is there a good reason why there isn't a space after each of those commas? To conserve space, I guess. > This one isn't even consistent: > > ! Copyright (C) 1988,1989,1990,1991,1992,1993,1994,1995,1996,1998,1999,2000 > ,2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I did make that consistent in the version I eventually committed.