From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4885 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2002 05:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4849 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2002 05:53:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2002 05:53:57 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA02780; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 07:51:50 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:54:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [wip] How to release section In-Reply-To: <3C447DE2.3040106@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2 On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> + As an aside, the branch tag name is probably regrettable vis: > >> + gdb_N_M-YYYY-MM-DD-@{branch,branchpoint@}. > > > > This should be in @file, and again double the `@'. > > Done. Not sure about the @ here. I'm trying to get > > gdb_N_M-YYYY-MM-DD-{branch,branchpoint} > > in the final doco. Oops, my bad: I missed the fact that there are braces there. @{ and @} is correct, sorry. > > `gdbadmin' is a command, so should be in @code. > > > It is an account. @code or @var or @file or??? I put it in an @file > for the moment. If it's an account, I think @code is the right one. @samp and @file are also okay, but @var is certainly wrong (it will be UPCASED in Info and italics in the printed maual--not what you want).