From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27994 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2002 07:44:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27962 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2002 07:44:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2002 07:44:32 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA23512; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:43:44 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:44:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] remove unwanted output in breakpoint_re_set_one In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20020114202242.0099adc0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2 On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr wrote: > So it should probably be the same here, but > can a shared lib loading change the watched addresses > needed to watch a given expression? Why not? For example, if some variable is static in the loaded library, its address gets fixed-up by the loader, no? > I suppose that a correct implementation would > just call mention if the watched address area are changed, > but I have no idea how that can be done, and I am not > enough interested in this to invest time to try to find out > how that could be accomplished. Then I think it's wrong to remove the message unconditionally. Ignoring a superflous message might be annoying, but if you remove the information altogether, users will have no way of getting it.