From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Add i386_cleanup_dregs at program exit.
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 02:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020109121714.1974A-100000@is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020109102139.020a5d80@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >Is this really necessary? Why do we need to propagate processor-specific
> >issues into breakpoint.c?
>
> Because there is no i386 common code that is called at program exit,
If we really need that, we could add one. There's nothing wrong IMHO
with having a target-specific mourne-inferior function.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 1:13 Pierre Muller
2002-01-09 1:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-09 1:25 ` Pierre Muller
2002-01-09 2:19 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SUN.3.91.1020109121714.1974A-100000@is \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox