From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11372 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2002 05:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11345 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2002 05:59:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jan 2002 05:59:04 -0000 Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA20960; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 07:58:18 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 21:59:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii X-Sender: eliz@is To: Michael Snyder cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Crasher bug in infptrace.c In-Reply-To: <3C30C36F.32D5@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00620.txt.bz2 On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Michael Snyder wrote: > May I suggest that this patch be accepted until someone > volunteers to do a better one? I didn't mean to say that the patch should be rejected. It's not my prerogative to do so in this case. > Does djgpp use infptrace? No, of course not.