From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11255-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9393 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2001 08:32:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9274 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2001 08:32:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2001 08:32:30 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA10218;
	Wed, 12 Dec 2001 10:31:50 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:32:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Klee Dienes <klee@apple.com>
cc: msnyder@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] add 'save-breakpoints' command
In-Reply-To: <bzofl5fo5l.fsf@salmon.localnet>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011212103102.10023J-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00322.txt.bz2


On 11 Dec 2001, Klee Dienes wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> 
> > session continues, is that right?  If so, there's no need to document
> > anything about that, except, perhaps, saying that the breakpoints,
> > when restored, will use the same input-radix as when they were
> > defined.
> 
> I'd say that's not really necessary

Okay, I don't mind if you leave the text as you suggested originally.

, since it's really just "saved
> breapoints will be restored correctly even if you have an odd
> input-radix set," which is what one would generally assume would
> happen.
>