From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-10730-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8587 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2001 12:39:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8564 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2001 12:39:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO is.elta.co.il) (199.203.121.2)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2001 12:39:36 -0000
Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA13026;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:39:01 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:54:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Sender: eliz@is
To: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] SSE registers for cygxin target.
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20011126104808.00acab48@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011126143653.12758G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00226.txt.bz2


On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Pierre Muller wrote:

> -#undef HAVE_SSE_REGS	/* FIXME! win32-nat.c needs to support XMMi registers */
> +/* Use SSE registers if winnt.h contains information about them.  */
> +#ifdef HAVE_CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS
> +#define HAVE_SSE_REGS
> +#else

Is it wise to have SSE registers supported based on the compile-time 
test?  What if the machine on which GDB runs doesn't have SSE?  Don't you 
need a run-time test as well?