From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jim Blandy Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@cygnus.com Subject: Re: [RFA] enum enable Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 01:53:00 -0000 Message-id: References: X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00001.html On 31 Jul 2001, Jim Blandy wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > I attach below, after the error messages, the part of patch for > > printcmd.c, which clearly shows that _all_ of the lines for which GCC > > complained on your machine should in fact have been patched by the > > patch I posted. How come it didn't work for you? > > That part of the patch doesn't appear in your most recent post: Right, I inadvertently deleted it when posting the augmented patch. Sorry. > I suspect your first patch had a similar problem, too. No, that one did have the patches for printcmd.c. See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-07/msg00339.html