From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] Mention -i=mi0; Was: [patch] Add -i=mi0 as an interpreter
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 23:52:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010705095354.15332L-100000@is>
References: <3B4384B7.3040902@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00083.html

On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> The attatched patch mentions -i=mi, -i=mi0 and even -i=mi1.  Ok?

It's okay, but:

> ! @samp{--interpreter=mi} (or @samp{--interpreter=mi1}) causes
> ! @value{GDBN} to use the @dfn{gdbmi interface} (@pxref{GDB/MI, , The
> ! @sc{gdb/mi} Interface}). The older @dfn{gdbmi interface} included in
> ! @value{GDBN} version 5.0 can be selected with @samp{--interpreter=mi0}.

Please don't use @dfn{gdbmi interface} more than once in the same
section.  @dfn is for introducing new terms; once you've introduced
it, it shouldn't be needed to do that again in the next sentence.

Also, I believe we were saying gdb/mi all over the place, not gdbmi.