From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Per Bothner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: partial merge of dwarf2.h Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 02:03:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <15142.34988.789826.392828@kwikemart.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00255.html On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Per Bothner writes: > > Elena Zannoni writes: > > > > > Shouldn't the copyright years include 2001 as well? > > > > Well, the gcc/dwarf2.h doesn't, and this is basically a merge > > from that. (There are some formatting differences, and there > > are also some extensions in the binutils version. I'm leaving those > > as is for now.) > > Ok, you haven't changed anything. But still, the file itself has been > touched. Hmm, I don't know what the rules are in this case. The rules are that the Copyright notice should mention years when someone worked on a released version of a file. So if the changes were done by GCC maintainers only in 2000, I think it is okay not to include 2001.