From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use `unsigned long' for Linux/x86 debug registers
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 04:06:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010401130258.17003B@is>
References: <200104011050.f31Aocd00404@delius.kettenis.local>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00004.html

On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Mark Kettenis wrote:

> It just occurred to me that Linux/x86 should really be using `unsigned
> long' instead of `long' as the type for debug register values.

They should indeed be unsigned, but why `unsigned long' instead of 
`unsigned int'?  i386-nat.c uses the latter, and ia32 debug registers
are 32-bit wide.