From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: kettenis@wins.uva.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Make Linux use the new unified x86 watchpoint support
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:06:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010329112816.3269L-100000@is>
References: <3AC24143.45EF127B@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00538.html

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Michael Snyder wrote:

> > I'm guessing that this call goes back to the implementation for
> > Sparclite, which uses this call to produce a side effect (to be able
> > to step over the instruction which caused the watchpoint to trigger),
> > see config/sparc/tm-sparclite.h.  Since this seems to be the only
> > platform which needs a side effect, and since we already have an
> > equivalent mechanism for doing the same, with the HAVE_*_WATCHPOINT
> > macros, I think this call can be removed.
> 
> I'd like to see it removed, but I'm chicken.  ;-)

What do others think about removing this call to STOPPED_BY_WATCHPOINT?  
Andrew?