From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Unified watchpoints for x86 platforms
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 00:57:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010318105304.11615A-100000@is>
References: <200103172253.f2HMrg509595@delius.kettenis.local>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00332.html

On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Mark Kettenis wrote:

> Oh, by the way, I don't think it's necessary to list changes for newly
> added files to the ChangeLog.  Just something like:
> 
>    * i386-nat.c: New file.
> 
> should be enough.

I know.  But does it hurt to have the new functions listed as well?

I was always annoyed by the fact that the first functions on each file 
need to be deduced by elimination, instead of just reading the logs.  
For example, imagine that you want to know when was a certain function 
introduced.