From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Revised C++ ABI abstraction patches
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 03:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010315130900.7550A-100000@is>
References: <200103150951.EAA25684@zwingli.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00221.html

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Jim Blandy wrote:

> They're not fit to be applied yet, since we don't yet automatically
> detect whether the executable uses the V3 or V2 ABI.

If it's important for users to be able to support the new ABI, you could 
add a command which tells GDB which ABI to expect, no?

> 	* cp-abi-gnu-v2.c (gnu_v2_destructor_prefix_p,
[...]
> 	(gnu-v3-abi.o): Add.
> 	(gnu-v2-abi.o): Add.

So what is it: cp-abi-gnu-v2 or gnu-v2-abi?  I prefer the latter, and I 
thought that was the conclusion of the earlier discussions about that.