Re: [PATCH RFA] procfs.c related changes for AIX 5

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>]

On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Kevin Buettner wrote:

> > >     These syscall numbers are guaranteed (at least according to the
> > >     developer that I spoke with) to be fixed for the lifetime of a
> > >     process, but they can certainly vary between processes.
> > 
> > Won't this cause problems with debugging syscall-related code, since
> > the values for GDB and the debuggee may be different?
> 
> GDB knows the pid of the debuggee and interogates its syscall
> numbers in /proc/PID/sysent.  I.e, it gets the syscall numbers
> for the child process that it's debugging from the /proc filesystem.

This probably takes care of most of the problems.

> If you're asking about actually debugging code that contains syscalls,
> I'm not sure I see how this enters the picture.  Does GDB have some
> additional knowledge of syscall numbers somewhere that I'm not aware
> of?

It was just a thought; I didn't have any specifics in mind.

One possible complication is when GDB invokes a function from the 
debuggee, and that function issues a system call.  Again, just a
random thought.

> > Shouldn't these be documented somehow in gdbint.texinfo?
> 
> Probably.  (I'll take a look.)

Thanks!