From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keith Seitz <keiths@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 13:12:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010214130716.13194N-100000@ryobi.cygnus.com>
References: <3A8AEFEA.A2E2A61E@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00221.html

> Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > 
> > Sounds reasonable.  Check it in (assuming you have already added yourself to the write after approval list).
> 
> Hold on -- aren't you defeating the purpose of this test?
> The test was added by HP precisely because these calls
> fail when malloc isn't included in the target program.
> The test is a duplicate of callfuncs.exp, except that it
> doesn't link malloc.

So the purpose of the test is to FAIL? What's the passing criteria?

Keith