From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27975 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2011 15:11:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 27966 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2011 15:11:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:11:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 32712 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2011 15:11:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 4 Aug 2011 15:11:37 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QozaB-0007MJ-SH; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:11:35 +0000 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:11:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Pedro Alves cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi Subject: Re: [RFA 5/8] New port: TI C6x: gdb port In-Reply-To: <201108041333.42945.pedro@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <4E2638A6.1070406@codesourcery.com> <201108041333.42945.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Pedro Alves wrote: > Seems like there are a lot of non-core registers here. Now that > the gdbserver patch has been updated to send in standard tic6x xml > register description features, all registers the target includes in the > description that are not part of the defined features should not need > to be hardcoded in gdb, since the xml description itself will describe > their sizes and names. See arm-tdep.c:arm_register_name for example. > More comments on this further down. Won't GDB need a list of how the register names correspond to DWARF register numbers (which are allocated for all these registers) somewhere? -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com