From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27917 invoked by alias); 19 May 2011 10:13:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 27907 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2011 10:13:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:13:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 18070 invoked from network); 19 May 2011 10:13:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 19 May 2011 10:13:16 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QN0EF-0002aj-4m; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:13:15 +0000 Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:13:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Yao Qi cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [_Complex test 2/4] _Complex type in varargs.exp In-Reply-To: <4DD49DA6.6040407@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <4DC401D0.1050500@codesourcery.com> <4DC75036.4040806@codesourcery.com> <4DD49DA6.6040407@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 May 2011, Yao Qi wrote: > This patch is to add _Complex type in vararg testing. > > Run varargs.exp on i686-pc-linux-gnu, get new two KFAIL. Note that PR > 12776 is opened to track this problem. I think such KFAILs need to be target specific, so only for 32-bit x86 in this case, since for each target architecture where such a test fails it's going to be a separate bug in that target's ABI implementation in GDB and should have a separate PR. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com