From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8004 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2009 19:25:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7992 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Sep 2009 19:25:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:05 +0000 Received: (qmail 629 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2009 19:25:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 17 Sep 2009 19:25:03 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MoMbF-0001rx-OY; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:01 +0000 Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:25:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Pedro Alves cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Paul Pluzhnikov , Eli Zaretskii , sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix "show convenience" test In-Reply-To: <200909171916.44937.pedro@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: References: <200909152132.15317.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <83iqfhwkhh.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0909171057j6c6ac9e3neb5f46912b10efe9@mail.gmail.com> <200909171916.44937.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1152306461-1667979821-1253215501=:5988" Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1152306461-1667979821-1253215501=:5988 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-length: 960 On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 17 September 2009 18:57:31, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > > > >=20 > > =A0 *sigh* > >=20 > > =A0 How old is base64 now, has it hit 15 years yet? =A0"text based mail= reader" > > =A0 my left foot, there's nothing to prevent a text based mail reader f= rom > > =A0 decoding mail in a 15 year old standard. > >=20 > > =A0 I can accept the argument that a pure text, 7bit ascii message of a > > =A0 text subtype shouldn't be encoded automatically. =A0I'm even supris= ed > > =A0 that its base64 encoded and not qp-encoded if there happened to be > > =A0 line-ending/wrapping concerns. > >=20 >=20 > I hope that means that they'll address it. :-) This also prevents > mail archives from showing the patch inline. Compare: It's a bug in the mail archiving software if it decides that based on=20 Content-Transfer-Encoding rather than Content-Disposition. --=20 Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com= ---1152306461-1667979821-1253215501=:5988--