From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2636 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2009 17:15:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 2626 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2009 17:15:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:15:18 +0000 Received: (qmail 1312 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2009 17:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Apr 2009 17:15:16 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LvE8A-0003L0-SR; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:15:06 +0000 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:15:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Eli Zaretskii cc: Carlos O'Donell , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Use makeinfo --html for HTML manuals In-Reply-To: <83iql1j4wi.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: References: <83iql1j4wi.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Why the discrepancy wrt the use of the -I $(srcdir) switch between the > commands for different manuals? I'd prefer them all to use that > switch, even if some of them do not @include any other files, to avoid > surprises if we some day add such directives. I'd agree they should all use that consistently with the options used for building info output. (And indeed that the DVI and PDF rules should be using -I as well instead of the older approach of setting TEXINPUTS that probably predates -I support in texi2dvi in 4.0, and all rules for a given manual should use the same directories.) I didn't change the existing (inconsistent) rules here, but it would be a worthwhile cleanup. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com