From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19613 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2009 05:59:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 19605 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2009 05:59:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:59:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 28832 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2009 05:58:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 6 Jan 2009 05:58:57 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1LK4xs-0006SB-E4; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:58:56 +0000 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:59:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Tom Tromey cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR 7286 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Tom Tromey wrote: > This does raise the question of what C variant gdb targets, or ought > to target. We could even have them all, with "set lang c99". The > same question arises for C++. You could also in principle detect C99 translation units with DW_LANG_C99, except that I think GCC uses DW_LANG_C89 at present for all C code, whatever mode it is compiled in. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com