From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25395 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2005 02:52:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 25387 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2005 02:52:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp04) (202.81.18.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:52:26 +0000 Received: from sd0112e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh903.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.201]) by ausmtp04 (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAN2pw9A063686 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:52:00 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.243]) by sd0112e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jAN2t2qu125692 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:55:06 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAN2pvQs013274 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:51:57 +1100 Received: from [9.181.133.252] ([9.181.133.252]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAN2pqa9013113; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:51:54 +1100 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:06:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC]: Patch to support Fortran derived type - Revised In-Reply-To: <20051122162358.GA19024@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20051122162358.GA19024@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2 On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 03:47:03PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote: > > By the way, anyone has any idea or comments about the patch? I am more > > than happy to improve it if you have any idea. > > > > According to the new maintenance policy, how long should I ping for my > > un-reviewed patch. If it still gets no reply in a specified time, is > > there anything I can do to get some attention, escalate this to the SC or > > anything else? > > There is no new policy. It's a proposal, still under discussion. Even > if it were adopted, escalating to the SC is almost never the right > thing to do: the SC is completely uninvolved in day-to-day development. OK. Understand. Hope that this is adopted soon. > As always, I review code patches as frequently as I am able. I'll get > to it. If any of the other global maintainers out there want to, of > course, they're invited to review contributions too! Thanks! You are really a big help here, for me and also many others I believe! Regards - Wu Zhou