From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7322 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2005 08:15:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 7315 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2005 08:15:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:15:51 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAM83O7a232738 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:09:43 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.244]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jAM7mgQc164326 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:53:03 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAM7haI2005064 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:43:36 +1100 Received: from [9.181.133.252] ([9.181.133.252]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAM7hYQv005014 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:43:35 +1100 Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:36:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC]: Patch to support Fortran derived type - Revised In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00405.txt.bz2 By the way, anyone has any idea or comments about the patch? I am more than happy to improve it if you have any idea. According to the new maintenance policy, how long should I ping for my un-reviewed patch. If it still gets no reply in a specified time, is there anything I can do to get some attention, escalate this to the SC or anything else? P.S: I am asking this because I don't have any knowledge about them ever since I join in the GDB community. I think other new members might also feel this way. Someone ever told me to wait for one or two weeks. But I am not sure. Regards - Wu Zhou On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Wu Zhou wrote: > Thanks for your comments. > > Yes. I am thinking of adding these to gdb manual. But I am not sure how > to organize them. As you know, we already have three subsection: Fortran > operators, Fortran defaults and special Fortran command. Which section > should this kind of text gets into? Maybe special Fortran commands? > But They are in fact common GDB command, only with somewhat different > output format. Maybe it make sense to add another new section? What do > you think? > > However I did added a few words in the Fortran operators section. Here is > the patch: > > Index: gdb.texinfo > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v > retrieving revision 1.296 > diff -u -p -r1.296 gdb.texinfo > --- gdb.texinfo 20 Nov 2005 06:12:59 -0000 1.296 > +++ gdb.texinfo 22 Nov 2005 07:05:01 -0000 > @@ -9159,6 +9159,10 @@ of the second one. > @item : > The range operator. Normally used in the form of array(low:high) to > represent a section of array. > + > +@item % > +Fortran 90 and afterwards use this to access the members of derived > +type, which is also introduced after the Fortran 90. > @end table > > @node Fortran Defaults > > > Regards > - Wu Zhou >