From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23739 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2005 03:30:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23722 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2005 03:30:36 -0000 Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:30:36 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAA3OExa125672 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:24:18 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.243]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id jAA3XAe6098554 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:33:11 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAA3U8Kl023767 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:30:08 +1100 Received: from [9.181.133.252] ([9.181.133.252]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAA3U3D3023672; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:30:06 +1100 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:15:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou To: Eli Zaretskii cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/Doc]: Some words about Fortran debugging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2 On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Googling finds teTeX's home page as the first hit: > > http://www.tug.org/teTeX/ I just got a teTex installed and do a "make dvi". No obvious error is detected. > > Okay, I will adopt most of what you said. But what about replace the word > > "only" with "mainly", because there is a little support for F95 already in > > current GDB. > > What F95 features do we support now? In fact, the array section operation is standardized in Fortran 90. Not any other Fortran 95 features is supported in current GDB. So I can change the word back to "only". (I am working on some Fortran 95 features, such as derived type and so on. Maybe I can change the wording when they are added into GDB.) > > Here goes the revised patch. > > Fine with me, thanks. Do you means that I can commit the patch into cvs tree, with the above wording change? Or that I still need to get other maintainers' approval? Regards - Wu Zhou