From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4440 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2005 09:21:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4426 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2005 09:21:10 -0000 Received: from ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp02.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.187) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:21:10 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp02.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j579GVZX384438 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:16:34 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.243]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j579NUQw077482 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:23:31 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j579KahH000521 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:20:36 +1000 Received: from plinuxt18.cn.ibm.com (plinuxt18.cn.ibm.com [9.181.140.28]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j579KYl3000470 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:20:35 +1000 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:21:00 -0000 From: Wu Zhou To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [RFA]: Fix a comment typo in expression.h Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 I found a typo when reading the source of expression.h. OK to commit? Thanks. 2005-06-07 Wu Zhou * expression.h (enum exp_opcode): Fix a comment typo. Index: expression.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/expression.h,v retrieving revision 1.14 diff -c -p -r1.14 expression.h *** expression.h 10 Apr 2004 22:10:00 -0000 1.14 --- expression.h 7 Jun 2005 09:10:03 -0000 *************** enum exp_opcode *** 192,198 **** /* This is EXACTLY like OP_FUNCALL but is semantically different. In F77, array subscript expressions, substring expressions and function calls are all exactly the same syntactically. They may ! only be dismabiguated at runtime. Thus this operator, which indicates that we have found something of the form ( ) */ OP_F77_UNDETERMINED_ARGLIST, --- 192,198 ---- /* This is EXACTLY like OP_FUNCALL but is semantically different. In F77, array subscript expressions, substring expressions and function calls are all exactly the same syntactically. They may ! only be disambiguated at runtime. Thus this operator, which indicates that we have found something of the form ( ) */ OP_F77_UNDETERMINED_ARGLIST,