From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/Patch] replace sprintf calls in remote.c with xsnprintf
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 06:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0505290648210.27903@plinuxt18.cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050528183924.GE26806@nevyn.them.org>
On Sat, 28 May 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > #define MAGIC_NULL_PID 42000
> > + #define REMOTE_PACKET_SIZE (rs->remote_packet_size)
>
> Please don't do this. Macros which reference local variables are very
> bad style, and confusing.
>
OK. I switch back to rs->remote_packet_size. Thanks for pointing this
out.
> > *************** remote_threads_extra_info (struct thread
> > *** 1859,1865 ****
> > int set;
> > threadref id;
> > struct gdb_ext_thread_info threadinfo;
> > ! static char display_buf[100]; /* arbitrary... */
> > char *bufp = alloca (rs->remote_packet_size);
> > int n = 0; /* position in display_buf */
> >
> > --- 1860,1868 ----
> > int set;
> > threadref id;
> > struct gdb_ext_thread_info threadinfo;
> > ! /* change the buffer size to 600 to hold shortname, dispaly
> > ! and more_display of threadinfo. */
> > ! static char display_buf[600];
> > char *bufp = alloca (rs->remote_packet_size);
> > int n = 0; /* position in display_buf */
> >
>
> Comments are full sentences (and you spelled display wrong). You
> didn't mention in the changelog that you changed the size of the
> buffer; I don't think it's necessary. Remember that remote_packet_size
> is target-dependent. If 100 has been good enough so far, it probably
> still is (though using xsnprintf is still a good thing).
>
Thanks. I will keep that in mind. As for the size of the buffer, I
still think that 100 might be overflowed in some scenario. But I can't
find such a scenario at this moment. I drop this change anyway.
> > --- 1927,1933 ----
> > /* Send the restart command; for reasons I don't understand the
> > remote side really expects a number after the "R". */
> > buf[0] = 'R';
> > ! xsnprintf (&buf[1], REMOTE_PACKET_SIZE - 1, "%x", 0);
> > putpkt (buf);
> >
> > /* Now query for status so this looks just like we restarted
>
> Might as well use "R%x" while you're here.
Good point.
Below is the revised patch. Please review and comment. TIA.
<2005-05-29> Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
* remote.c (set_thread, remote_thread_alive): Replace sprintf
call with xsnprintf.
(remote_threads_extra_info, extended_remote_restart)
(remote_check_symbols, store_register_using_P)
(compare_sections_command): Ditto.
Index: remote.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
retrieving revision 1.192
diff -c -p -r1.192 remote.c
*** remote.c 28 May 2005 18:57:13 -0000 1.192
--- remote.c 29 May 2005 05:35:44 -0000
*************** set_thread (int th, int gen)
*** 1056,1064 ****
buf[3] = '\0';
}
else if (th < 0)
! sprintf (&buf[2], "-%x", -th);
else
! sprintf (&buf[2], "%x", th);
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
if (gen)
--- 1056,1064 ----
buf[3] = '\0';
}
else if (th < 0)
! xsnprintf (&buf[2], rs->remote_packet_size - 2, "-%x", -th);
else
! xsnprintf (&buf[2], rs->remote_packet_size - 2, "%x", th);
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
if (gen)
*************** remote_thread_alive (ptid_t ptid)
*** 1076,1084 ****
char buf[16];
if (tid < 0)
! sprintf (buf, "T-%08x", -tid);
else
! sprintf (buf, "T%08x", tid);
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, sizeof (buf), 0);
return (buf[0] == 'O' && buf[1] == 'K');
--- 1076,1084 ----
char buf[16];
if (tid < 0)
! xsnprintf (buf, sizeof (buf), "T-%08x", -tid);
else
! xsnprintf (buf, sizeof (buf), "T%08x", tid);
putpkt (buf);
getpkt (buf, sizeof (buf), 0);
return (buf[0] == 'O' && buf[1] == 'K');
*************** remote_threads_extra_info (struct thread
*** 1869,1875 ****
if (use_threadextra_query)
{
! sprintf (bufp, "qThreadExtraInfo,%x", PIDGET (tp->ptid));
putpkt (bufp);
getpkt (bufp, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
if (bufp[0] != 0)
--- 1869,1876 ----
if (use_threadextra_query)
{
! xsnprintf (bufp, rs->remote_packet_size, "qThreadExtraInfo,%x",
! PIDGET (tp->ptid));
putpkt (bufp);
getpkt (bufp, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
if (bufp[0] != 0)
*************** remote_threads_extra_info (struct thread
*** 1890,1901 ****
if (threadinfo.active)
{
if (*threadinfo.shortname)
! n += sprintf(&display_buf[0], " Name: %s,", threadinfo.shortname);
if (*threadinfo.display)
! n += sprintf(&display_buf[n], " State: %s,", threadinfo.display);
if (*threadinfo.more_display)
! n += sprintf(&display_buf[n], " Priority: %s",
! threadinfo.more_display);
if (n > 0)
{
--- 1891,1904 ----
if (threadinfo.active)
{
if (*threadinfo.shortname)
! n += xsnprintf (&display_buf[0], sizeof (display_buf) - n,
! " Name: %s,", threadinfo.shortname);
if (*threadinfo.display)
! n += xsnprintf (&display_buf[n], sizeof (display_buf) - n,
! " State: %s,", threadinfo.display);
if (*threadinfo.more_display)
! n += xsnprintf (&display_buf[n], sizeof (display_buf) - n,
! " Priority: %s", threadinfo.more_display);
if (n > 0)
{
*************** extended_remote_restart (void)
*** 1920,1927 ****
/* Send the restart command; for reasons I don't understand the
remote side really expects a number after the "R". */
! buf[0] = 'R';
! sprintf (&buf[1], "%x", 0);
putpkt (buf);
/* Now query for status so this looks just like we restarted
--- 1923,1929 ----
/* Send the restart command; for reasons I don't understand the
remote side really expects a number after the "R". */
! xsnprintf (&buf, rs->remote_packet_size, "R%x", 0);
putpkt (buf);
/* Now query for status so this looks just like we restarted
*************** remote_check_symbols (struct objfile *ob
*** 2138,2148 ****
msg[end] = '\0';
sym = lookup_minimal_symbol (msg, NULL, NULL);
if (sym == NULL)
! sprintf (msg, "qSymbol::%s", &reply[8]);
else
! sprintf (msg, "qSymbol:%s:%s",
! paddr_nz (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (sym)),
! &reply[8]);
putpkt (msg);
getpkt (reply, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
}
--- 2140,2150 ----
msg[end] = '\0';
sym = lookup_minimal_symbol (msg, NULL, NULL);
if (sym == NULL)
! xsnprintf (msg, rs->remote_packet_size, "qSymbol::%s", &reply[8]);
else
! xsnprintf (msg, rs->remote_packet_size, "qSymbol:%s:%s",
! paddr_nz (SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (sym)),
! &reply[8]);
putpkt (msg);
getpkt (reply, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
}
*************** store_register_using_P (int regnum)
*** 3435,3441 ****
char regp[MAX_REGISTER_SIZE];
char *p;
! sprintf (buf, "P%s=", phex_nz (reg->pnum, 0));
p = buf + strlen (buf);
regcache_raw_collect (current_regcache, reg->regnum, regp);
bin2hex (regp, p, register_size (current_gdbarch, reg->regnum));
--- 3437,3443 ----
char regp[MAX_REGISTER_SIZE];
char *p;
! xsnprintf (buf, rs->remote_packet_size, "P%s=", phex_nz (reg->pnum, 0));
p = buf + strlen (buf);
regcache_raw_collect (current_regcache, reg->regnum, regp);
bin2hex (regp, p, register_size (current_gdbarch, reg->regnum));
*************** compare_sections_command (char *args, in
*** 4908,4914 ****
matched = 1; /* do this section */
lma = s->lma;
/* FIXME: assumes lma can fit into long. */
! sprintf (buf, "qCRC:%lx,%lx", (long) lma, (long) size);
putpkt (buf);
/* Be clever; compute the host_crc before waiting for target
--- 4910,4917 ----
matched = 1; /* do this section */
lma = s->lma;
/* FIXME: assumes lma can fit into long. */
! xsnprintf (buf, rs->remote_packet_size, "qCRC:%lx,%lx",
! (long) lma, (long) size);
putpkt (buf);
/* Be clever; compute the host_crc before waiting for target
Cheers
- Wu Zhou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-29 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-26 14:59 Wu Zhou
2005-05-28 18:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-29 6:55 ` Wu Zhou [this message]
2005-06-17 2:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-06-17 4:38 ` Wu Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0505290648210.27903@plinuxt18.cn.ibm.com \
--to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox