From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: hbreak.exp: Test hardware breakpoints
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0709261531470.23821@perivale.mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4053daab0709260729r4a419defs5f95d4b84c44bcc3@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > I used "RUNTESTFLAGS=--target-board native-gdbserver gdb.base/hbreak.exp"
> > exactly.
> >
>
> --target-board != --target_board
> ^ ^
>
> '-' vs '_'
Good catch, thanks. The result is:
=== gdb Summary ===
# of expected passes 43
# of unexpected failures 28
with the first failure being:
(gdb) Process [...]/build-i386/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break
created; pid = 16195
Listening on port 2346
target remote localhost:2346
Remote debugging using localhost:2346
Remote debugging from host 127.0.0.1
0x40000c20 in ?? () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
Couldn't write debug register: No such process.
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/hbreak.exp: run until function breakpoint
That message comes from i386_linux_dr_set(), so that looks like a bug
somewhere with `gdbserver' not passing correct breakpoint data downstream.
Which is obviously not a bug with the test script itself, but if people
insist on keeping the bug I could make the script conditional on
"gdb,no_hardware_watchpoints".
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-26 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-12 18:10 Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-21 23:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-24 11:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-24 11:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-26 14:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-26 14:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-26 14:25 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-26 14:29 ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-26 14:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2007-09-26 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-27 9:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-09-27 12:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-30 1:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-23 17:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-27 15:39 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-03-01 4:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0709261531470.23821@perivale.mips.com \
--to=macro@mips.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox