From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16962 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2007 14:25:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16949 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2007 14:25:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from dmz.mips-uk.com (HELO dmz.mips-uk.com) (194.74.144.194) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:25:22 +0000 Received: from internal-mx1 ([192.168.192.240] helo=ukservices1.mips.com) by dmz.mips-uk.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1IaXpH-0000Wu-00; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:25:19 +0100 Received: from perivale.mips.com ([192.168.192.200]) by ukservices1.mips.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1IaXpC-00084l-00; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:25:14 +0100 Received: from macro (helo=localhost) by perivale.mips.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IaXpC-000813-81; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:25:14 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:25:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: hbreak.exp: Test hardware breakpoints In-Reply-To: <20070926142137.GA29702@caradoc.them.org> Message-ID: References: <20070921230133.GB28500@caradoc.them.org> <20070924113241.GA7618@caradoc.them.org> <20070926142137.GA29702@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MIPS-Technologies-UK-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MIPS-Technologies-UK-MailScanner-From: macro@mips.com Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00370.txt.bz2 On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > That shouldn't happen. Did you use --target instead of > --target_board? I used "RUNTESTFLAGS=--target-board native-gdbserver gdb.base/hbreak.exp" exactly. Maciej