From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Chris Dearman <chris@mips.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: mips-tdep.c: Adjust breakpoints in branch delay slots
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705251843500.13913@perivale.mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070525131910.GA28994@caradoc.them.org>
On Fri, 25 May 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > FYI, I have now checked Linux and it should be fine -- must have been my
> > bad memory. EJTAG has provisions for handling this correctly
> > (cp0.debug.dbd), but I'm not sure if associated software gets it right.
EJTAG seems to be getting it right in principle -- there is one corner
case affecting us which I have identified, but it should be taken care of
elsewhere.
> Great. Want to take a look at doing this the other way then?
As much as I'd like to I may not be able to do it right now.
> The best option I can think of would be to fake the PC value based on
> the value of BD. You might be able to do this cleverly; have a
> register named "$pc" which shows the hardware contents of the PC
> register, and have read_pc / unwind_pc / write_pc adjust based on BD.
Note that there is nothing special needed for write_pc -- if you modify
the PC, you just write the new value to the "register" (there is actually
no such register as the PC in the MIPS architecture -- it's merely a
useful notion of "the next instruction to execute", which depending on the
way a debugger accesses the processor may happen to be recorded in various
cp0 registers).
BD is a merely a status bit which does not affect subsequent ERET/DERET.
> I'm not sure if that will work, but it does mimic the architecture
> behavior, which is an encouraging sign; and some other platforms do
> similar magic (e.g. HP/UX and IA64).
This is not rocket science -- the basic issue is to make gdb "accept" a
breakpoint that signals at a different address to one it was set at.
> It might be best to eliminate the setting of PC_REGNUM first, but
> that's multi-arch work; I see that dwarf2-frame.c relies on it unless
> you set dwarf2_frame_default_init_reg.
I am not sure what you mean here...
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-15 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-24 18:08 Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-05-24 18:21 ` Mark Kettenis
2007-05-24 18:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705251217190.13913@perivale.mips.com>
2007-05-25 12:50 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-05-25 13:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0705251318500.13913@perivale.mips.com>
2007-05-25 13:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-15 14:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2007-05-25 13:21 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-05-25 13:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0705251843500.13913@perivale.mips.com \
--to=macro@mips.com \
--cc=chris@mips.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox