From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-48668-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25087 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2007 13:31:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 25075 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2007 13:31:12 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from dmz.mips-uk.com (HELO dmz.mips-uk.com) (194.74.144.194)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:31:10 +0100
Received: from internal-mx1 ([192.168.192.240] helo=ukservices1.mips.com) 	by dmz.mips-uk.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) 	id 1HiVy6-00005M-00; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:31:06 +0100
Received: from perivale.mips.com ([192.168.192.200]) 	by ukservices1.mips.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) 	id 1HiVy0-0005Zp-00; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:31:00 +0100
Received: from macro (helo=localhost) 	by perivale.mips.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.63) 	(envelope-from <macro@mips.com>) 	id 1HiVy0-00083Z-4t; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:31:00 +0100
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:44:00 -0000
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] dwarf2 unwinder and MIPS n32
In-Reply-To: <20070430132118.GC25539@caradoc.them.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704301427440.20399@perivale.mips.com>
References: <20070428202914.GA8077@caradoc.them.org>  <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704301335560.20399@perivale.mips.com>  <20070430132118.GC25539@caradoc.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MIPS-Technologies-UK-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MIPS-Technologies-UK-MailScanner-From: macro@mips.com
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> I see the read_reg part of this patch has been updated to apply to
> HEAD, but do you know if it is older than this change?  If so, it's
> probably not necessary anymore.

 Well, 2005-01-22 is the original date, so it is somewhat older indeed.  
I have not tried to check whether any of the changes have become redundant 
since that change -- the patch builds and causes no regressions as far as 
I can tell.  I would normally check the usefulness of these changes before 
submission.

  Maciej