From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 519 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2004 19:29:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 484 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 19:29:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 19:29:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 15959 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 19:29:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 19:29:01 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CVERg-0007YJ-HU; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:29:24 +0000 Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:29:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk To: Andrew Cagney cc: Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, kevinb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Assume solib.h In-Reply-To: <419E2914.1020903@gnu.org> Message-ID: References: <4193BFA0.3060607@gnu.org> <200411112005.iABK5FrV098628@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4193DDCE.7060205@gnu.org> <200411112224.iABMODmo099121@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <4194DBEB.6010304@gnu.org> <01c4c8db$Blat.v2.2.2$377f5020@zahav.net.il> <419942CB.4000905@gnu.org> <01c4cb98$Blat.v2.2.2$fc133040@zahav.net.il> <419A2742.8070804@gnu.org> <200411161917.iAGJHqO8000702@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <419CAD27.5080908@gnu.org> <200411181436.iAIEabdF025983@juw15.nfra.nl> <419E2914.1020903@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2 On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Have fun, and thank you for your patience. (Hmm, what's left, if Solaris is > useable, it's time to add a NEWS entry!) The AMD64 Solaris 10 port is already working reasonably without needing any solib changes (modulo Solaris kernel bugs), though there are some test failures I have yet to investigate to see whether they are GDB or Solaris bugs. Of course I'll update the port as required by future changes in GDB that require it to be updated (as opposed to changes requiring only the x86 Solaris <= 9 port - which I can't test - to be updated). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com