From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10336 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2005 22:23:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10240 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2005 22:23:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.130) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 20 Apr 2005 22:23:18 -0000 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3KMNHAa666686 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:23:17 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j3KMNHia268964 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:23:17 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3KMNG4L024524 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:23:16 -0600 Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j3KMNGRJ024508; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:23:16 -0600 Received: from lazy.austin.ibm.com (lazy.austin.ibm.com [9.53.94.97]) by austin.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j3KMNGeT059010; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:23:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:23:00 -0000 From: Manoj Iyer X-X-Sender: manjo@lazy To: Mark Kettenis cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] unsigned32 and unsigned64 is multiply defined in sim-types.h. In-Reply-To: <200504202206.j3KM6nPZ022715@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: References: <200504202206.j3KM6nPZ022715@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2005-04/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 oh! I dint even think of it in that angle... u have a good point there mark. ----- manjo +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Cogito ergo sum + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:01:52 -0500 (CDT) > From: Manoj Iyer > > --- src/sim/common/sim-types.h 2002-11-22 19:12:05.000000000 -0600 > +++ new/src/sim/common/sim-types.h 2005-04-20 09:52:45.000000000 -0500 > @@ -112,11 +112,11 @@ typedef struct { signed64 a[2]; } signed > typedef signed char signed8; > typedef signed short signed16; > #if defined (__ALPHA__) > -typedef signed int unsigned32; > -typedef signed long unsigned64; > +typedef signed int signed32; > +typedef signed long signed64; > #else > -typedef signed long unsigned32; > -typedef signed long long unsigned64; > +typedef signed long signed32; > +typedef signed long long signed64; > #endif > > typedef unsigned char unsigned8; > > B.t.w. this whole bit of code looks highly suspicious (but that's not > your fault Manjo). It looks as if this implies the alpha is still the > only 64-bit architecture around. > > Mark > >