From: "Theodore A. Roth" <troth@openavr.org>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] initialize err variable in load_section_callback()
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0410261100140.17083@knuth.amplepower.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417D9450.2030401@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 3875 bytes --]
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I just encountered a problem with using the "load" command with a remote
> >>>avr target. The first packet would be sent to the remote target and then
> >>>gdb would just give up with this error message:
> >>>
> >>> (gdb) load
> >>> Loading section .text, size 0x1f8 lma 0x0
> >>> Sending packet: $M0,a:0c9446000c9463000c94#d7...Ack
> >>> Packet received: OK
> >>> Memory access error while loading section .text.
> >>>
> >>>It looks like load_section_callback() in symfile.c is assuming that a
> >>>call to target_write_memory_partial() will set the err variable.
> >>>Unfortunately, that is not a valid assumption.
> >>>
> >>>The attached patch got things working again, but this feels like a hack
> >>>to me since target_write_memory_partial() should really be setting err
> >>>to a sane value before returning.
> >>>
> >>>Patch is against today's cvs mainline.
> >>
> >>Here's the contract:
> >>/* Make a single attempt at transfering LEN bytes. On a successful
> >> transfer, the number of bytes actually transfered is returned and
> >> ERR is set to 0. When a transfer fails, -1 is returned (the number
> >> of bytes actually transfered is not defined) and ERR is set to a
> >> non-zero error indication. */
> >>So the bug is further down the target stack.
> >
> >
> > Both target_write_memory_partial() and target_read_memory_partial()
> > break that contract then:
> >
> > int
> > target_write_memory_partial (CORE_ADDR memaddr, char *buf, int len, int *err)
> > {
> > if (target_xfer_partial_p ())
> > return target_xfer_partial (target_stack, TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, NULL,
> > NULL, buf, memaddr, len);
> > else
> > return target_xfer_memory_partial (memaddr, buf, len, 1, err);
> > }
> >
> > If target_xfer_partial_p() returns true (which the avr port does), then
> > err is never set and the caller will see garbage if it didn't initialize
> > err.
> >
> > Should the return value of the target_xfer_partial() call be checked, or
> > should err just be blindly see to zero?
>
> The result will need to be checked, and *err set accordingly.
>
> Hmm, to_xfer_partial doesn't specify how to handle errors. We'd better
> pin that down.
>
> Of hand the interface could allow:
>
> - when -1, set *err to errno
Attached patch implements the above case.
> - when -1, set *err to EIO
I dug down the stack to see if there was a guarantee if errno is going
to be set if retval -1. I didn't see that so I'm a bit nervous about my
attached patch. Would it make any sense to set errno to 0 before the
call to target_xfer_partial(), then if retval is -1 also check errno?
I.e. if errno == 0, set *err to EIO, else *err to errno.
> - when -ve, set *err -VE return value
I assume -ve is an error code? Sould I extend my patch to also check for
retval < -1 and if so set *err to retval?
>
> I suspect that it should be the first. The comments for
> target_read_partial should also be updated to mention this.
You lost me on this one. target_read_partial() with comments currently
reads like this:
/* Target vector read/write partial wrapper functions.
NOTE: cagney/2003-10-21: I wonder if having "to_xfer_partial
(inbuf, outbuf)", instead of separate read/write methods, make life
easier. */
LONGEST
target_read_partial (struct target_ops *ops,
enum target_object object,
const char *annex, void *buf,
ULONGEST offset, LONGEST len)
{
return target_xfer_partial (ops, object, annex, buf, NULL, offset, len);
}
Was there some other comment you had in mind?
Thanks for helping me with this.
---
Ted Roth
PGP Key ID: 0x18F846E9
Jabber ID: troth@jabber.org
[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1786 bytes --]
2004-10-26 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
* target.c (target_read_memory_partial): Make sure the err is set.
(target_write_memory_partial): Ditto.
Index: target.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/target.c,v
retrieving revision 1.90
diff -u -p -p -r1.90 target.c
--- target.c 8 Oct 2004 20:29:55 -0000 1.90
+++ target.c 26 Oct 2004 17:35:14 -0000
@@ -1233,8 +1233,20 @@ int
target_read_memory_partial (CORE_ADDR memaddr, char *buf, int len, int *err)
{
if (target_xfer_partial_p ())
- return target_xfer_partial (target_stack, TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, NULL,
- buf, NULL, memaddr, len);
+ {
+ int retval = target_xfer_partial (target_stack, TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY,
+ NULL, buf, NULL, memaddr, len);
+
+ /* troth/2004-10-26: Are we certain that errno will be set properly if
+ the above call returns -1? */
+
+ if (retval == -1)
+ *err = errno;
+ else
+ *err = 0;
+
+ return retval;
+ }
else
return target_xfer_memory_partial (memaddr, buf, len, 0, err);
}
@@ -1243,8 +1255,17 @@ int
target_write_memory_partial (CORE_ADDR memaddr, char *buf, int len, int *err)
{
if (target_xfer_partial_p ())
- return target_xfer_partial (target_stack, TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY, NULL,
- NULL, buf, memaddr, len);
+ {
+ int retval = target_xfer_partial (target_stack, TARGET_OBJECT_MEMORY,
+ NULL, NULL, buf, memaddr, len);
+
+ if (retval == -1)
+ *err = errno;
+ else
+ *err = 0;
+
+ return retval;
+ }
else
return target_xfer_memory_partial (memaddr, buf, len, 1, err);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-26 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-19 20:22 Theodore A. Roth
2004-10-20 17:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-20 18:07 ` Theodore A. Roth
2004-10-26 0:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-26 18:19 ` Theodore A. Roth [this message]
2004-12-28 9:10 ` Theodore A. Roth
2005-03-04 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-12-02 14:45 Paul Schlie
2005-01-04 7:31 Paul Schlie
2005-01-14 23:29 ` Paul Schlie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.53.0410261100140.17083@knuth.amplepower.com \
--to=troth@openavr.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox