Re: [RFC] Interpreters (~final) (fwd)

Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29T00:02:47Z

> Keith Seitz wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>
>> > I think this is a great feature (required also for Emacs's GUD interface
>> > to switch to MI instead of using the (deprecated) annotations). However,
>> > I think it should be documented in the GDB manual (more accurately in
>> > gdbmi.texinfo).
>
>>
>> I have documentation for all the changes I've made in the interpreter
>> branch that I've been working on. I have not yet submitted them because I
>> didn't want to overload maintainers with a zillion patches.
>>
>> If it is desired, I can post the documentation patches.
>
>
> This might be a good way for folks to get a handle on the work before
> reviewing it.

Yes. The patch needs to include both the testcase and the doco changes
(I note the doco has been posted).

Andrew