From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11399 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 02:46:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11392 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 02:46:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 02:46:56 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:n5ygKaafP+WEChIQU2FolRrnd6kXFXzu@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8K2ncR01416; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:49:38 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:46:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Andrew Cagney cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.3 branch? Was: insight rename patch In-Reply-To: <3D8A84B3.7040300@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Does anyone have any thoughts on this main.c -> gdb.c/insight.c change > being backported to the 5.3 branch? Nothing more intelligible than, "it's a good idea." > Did you mean s/insight.c/insight-main.c/? I like ``insight.c'' and > ``gdb.c'' :-) That's okay with me, too. I overlooked the bit about how gdb was getting gdb.c... Keith